
So even though I thought my foreshadowing was wrong, I was correct. I find out in this section of my reading that Flagg indeed was the cause of Sasha's death. Flagg bribed Sasha's housewife to kill her during of the birth of Thomas, in return for Flagg saving the Housewife's dying son. This now has become dramatic irony because the people in the story including Peter and the King, thought that Thomas, the child that Sasha was giving birth to when she was murdered, was the cause of the mother's death, even though we know that Flagg, with his promise of attending Sasha's funeral, was actually the mastermind behind the death. This was one of the reasons Thomas felt like the "black sheep" of the family. Thomas, the youngest heir was also a very envious man over his older brother. Peter was morally correct, caring, and helpful young man and everyone saw this. Speaking of tri-colons, which I just so happened to use, King has used tri-colons to enhance his description of certain objects, one example being on page 55 where King describes Thomas to be a "...sad boy, a confused boy, and often an unlucky boy." King masterminds the effect of detailed description in minimal words, which makes the book easier to follow. I have also noticed that as certain details become more, and more important in the story, King used repetition in many different instances; page 46 "Put that down, put it down,...do you hear, so put that down", page 47 "Turrible pain for the horse. Turrible pain.". Although this is only two instances I have noticed two patterns in his use of repetition, he usually repeats the phrase or word twice, and they seem to always describe some tragedy. This book seems to be very predictable, but also very interesting.